Initiative Proposes $15 an Hour for SeaTac Airport Workers
Aug 26, 2013
A proposal to raise the wages of workers in and around Seattle-Tacoma
International Airport has drawn national attention -- and big cash is starting
There are just 11,852 registered voters in the city of SeaTac eligible to vote
Nov. 5 on an initiative setting a $15-an-hour minimum wage for thousands of
airport, hotel, car-rental and other employees. (The state's minimum wage is
$9.19 an hour.)
Supporters and opponents of the measure already have raised $440,000 combined
for the looming battle -- about $37 per voter.
Common Sense SeaTac, a business-funded political-action committee seeking to
defeat the union-backed measure, had raised more than $243,000 as of Thursday,
according to reports filed with the state Public Disclosure Commission (PDC).
That includes $75,000 from the American Car Rental Association, $50,000 from a
PAC representing state hotel owners and $15,000 each from Alaska Airlines and
the Washington Restaurant Association.
Supporters of the wage law, organized as Yes! For SeaTac, have raised more than
$197,000. That includes $50,000 from the state council of the Service Employees
International Union and $25,000 from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
In addition to a $15 minimum wage for airport-related businesses, the initiative
would require employers to provide paid sick leave and offer jobs to part-time
workers before hiring new full-time employees. If an affected business were
sold, the new owner would be required to retain existing employees for at least
Those requirements could be waived if a business agreed to a
collective-bargaining agreement with a union.
Supporters of the law say airport workers deserve a living wage and argue it
would benefit businesses where those workers shop.
"People are very aware of the fact that SeaTac could thrive if the workers who
work at the airport had a little more money in their pockets," said Heather
Weiner, spokeswomen for the initiative campaign.
But opponents argue the measure would harm businesses and lead to fewer jobs for
"There are a lot of repercussions. This is the broadest sweep of any ordinance
like this that's been tried around the country," said Don Stark, a business
lobbyist working with the opposition campaign.
Source: (c)2013 The Seattle Times Distributed by MCT Information Services